Beaver activists claim they are 'doing God's work'

Local communities and conservationists brought beavers from Europe and released them into the UK without official consent. These unauthorized releases were considered illegal and harmful to the environment as they could lead to unintended consequences such as flooding, tree damage, and conflicts with landowners.

Despite the risks and legal concerns, the activists believed that the benefits of reintroducing beavers outweighed the negatives. They argued that beavers could help in flood prevention, improving water quality, and enhancing biodiversity. This led them to take matters into their own hands and release beavers into the wild without official authorization.

While some feared the impact of beavers on farmland and ecosystems, others saw the potential for coexistence and cooperation between beavers and humans. They suggested that proper management and control measures could mitigate potential conflicts and ensure the benefits of having beavers in the wild.

The debate surrounding the release of beavers without a license highlighted the complex relationship between conservation efforts, legal regulations, and the need for wildlife management. It raised questions about the best approaches to reintroducing species, balancing ecological benefits with potential risks, and involving different stakeholders in decision-making processes.